How Much Time Will It Take?

Less than you expect. The hard part is already handled.

The second question everyone asks

It is the right question. You have operations to run, teams stretched across priorities, and the last thing anyone needs is a multi-month project that pulls people away from their actual work. The way most organizations currently approach website auditing, governance, and diagnostics is massively inefficient. Staff are not failing - the model they are working in is failing them. The traditional answer was specialist consultants, months of training, and a process that never seemed to end.

We automated website auditing in 1999. What clients are calling the biggest change in how this work gets done in 25 years is what we are now introducing - Generation II. Intelligent automation removes 94%+ of the scanning, auditing, prioritization, and reporting without human involvement. That is not an assertion: it is the product of 25 years of iteration, built by the people who built the first generation. What remains is manageable, guided, and designed around how your teams already work.

This is not about perfection. It is about a pragmatic approach: deal with the pages people actually visit, focus effort on the issues that carry the most legal weight, bring down the biggest visitor barriers, and stop treating an unvisited archived page with the same urgency as your homepage.

"It is not perfection, it's about removing distraction and making a difference. If you can remove more than 75% of the Risk, for 10% of typical project costs - why not start here?"

The 94%+ you never touch

Automation handles the heavy lift across every stage of the program.

The reason the time commitment is low is not because corners are being cut. It is because scanning, auditing, prioritization, reporting, and risk analysis are handled continuously by automation. What remains for your team is the exception handling - the small percentage that needs a human judgment call.

Prioritization99%

Auditing98%

Staff support94%

Risk analysis92%

Claims management90%

staged deployment.

When the cost and distraction are minimized, what remains for you is confidence, for site visitors inclusion.

ADA and digital accessibility compliance is, at its core, a set of rules and an appetite-to-risk consideration. Unlike cyber risk, this is a risk that can be understood, scoped, and taken control of with confidence. The complexity often attached to it is unnecessary, perhaps driven by those selling billable hours rather than solving the problem.

Our focus is on scale and consistency. Years of supporting compliance projects have shaped a process that removes the complexity, addresses the requirements methodically, and keeps costs down. We are not making promises about AI magic. We are applying proven automation to a structured problem, so organizations can move forward with confidence, without the distraction, without the inflated costs, and with clarity on where they stand.

Internal Kickoff

45-minute session to walk through the program and what happens next.

No preparation needed from your side. We cover the structure, the stages, and who does what, so your team has a clear picture before anything starts.

Program outline and structure.
Your contacts and support channels.
The 6 stages, summarized.
Reference materials to follow.

Roles

Project Lead

Member A

Member B

Member C

StartWeek 2Week 6-8Week 9Week 14Week 16-26

Kickoff

Week 1Weeks 3-5Week 8Week 10+Week 15Week 20+

Swipe to explore timeline

Managing exceptions, not chasing perfection

The expert view, often from people paid by the hour, is that everything needs to be addressed and perfection is the standard. That sounds thorough. In practice, it is the reason so many organizations never start, or start and stall within months.

The program takes a different position. Technology maps your priority content by value and risk, identifies the pages people actually visit, and focuses effort on the issues that carry the most legal weight. An unvisited policy document from 2019 does not get treated with the same urgency as your enrollment form or your homepage. That is not cutting corners. That is triage, and it is how risk management works in every other discipline.

The 5% that requires human attention is the exception handling: reviewing flagged content, making judgment calls on ambiguous items, and confirming corrections. The platform shows your team exactly what needs fixing, where it is, and what the fix looks like. No specialist knowledge required. Manageable steps, guided support, at the point of the issue.

"How about manageable steps, guided support showing the detail of what is needed, making content compliance as easy as using email."

If you can use email, you can do this

The corrections that matter most are content-level: adding alt text to an image, fixing a heading that skips a level, labeling a form field, updating a link description. These are not technical tasks. They are editorial tasks, and anyone who publishes content already has the skills to handle them.

The platform provides guided correction at the point of the issue. Staff do not need to interpret a 200-page audit report or understand WCAG success criteria by number. They see the issue, they see the fix, and they make the change. Learning happens in context, not in a training room.

Screenshot of the guided correction interface showing specific issues with suggested fixes

Guided correction: the platform shows what to fix and how

"91% of ADA claims trace back to 15 key requirements, and these are overwhelmingly content failures. Focus on what matters, not everything."

Vendors have to play their part

This is not all on you. Your CMS provider, your web agency, your PDF vendor, your form builder - they all have a responsibility for the accessibility of their own platforms. That responsibility should be contracted, documented, and audited.

Too often, vendors bill their customers for remediating issues that originate in their own systems. Or they self-certify compliance without independent verification. That is not acceptable, and it is not something you should be paying for or spending time on.

The program gives you the language, the data, and the leverage to hold vendors accountable. Compliance declarations should be contracted against, and VPATs audited. This is not adversarial. It is due diligence.

Screenshot of the vendor management interface showing vendor compliance tracking

Vendor management: track vendor compliance and accountability

"Be warned - vendors have to play their part as well. Not by billing you for their own system, or professional services for issues in their platform."

Start with independent clarity

A risk audit tells you where you stand before you commit to anything. That is not a sales step. It is how risk management works in every other discipline.