Skip to main content
AAAtraq - Accessibility Risk Management

What is a VPAT?

A Practical Guide for Buyers and Risk Teams

Introduction

If you are buying or selling software, you may be asked for a VPAT. This is common in sectors such as government, higher education, and regulated organizations, for example, but the requirement is not limited to these areas.

Most people encountering the term for the first time are unsure what it means, what it proves, or how seriously to treat it.

A VPAT is a structured document used by software vendors to describe how their product aligns with recognised accessibility standards. It supports procurement and risk review. It is not a certificate. It is not proof of legal compliance. It is a disclosure statement.

Understanding how to read one properly can reduce procurement risk and prevent false assurance.

A VPAT tells you what the vendor says about their product. An independent audit tells you what is actually there.

What a VPAT Is

VPAT stands for Voluntary Product Accessibility Template.

It is a reporting template created by the Information Technology Industry Council to standardise how vendors describe accessibility conformance.

A completed VPAT:

  • Lists accessibility criteria
  • States whether the product supports each requirement
  • Explains limitations or exceptions
  • Provides remarks and technical notes

Most VPATs are structured against recognised accessibility standards such as:

WCAG

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. The international standard for making web content accessible to people with disabilities.


W3C guidelines
Section 508

US federal accessibility standard requiring electronic and information technology to be accessible to people with disabilities.


Section508.gov
EN 301 549

European standard for accessibility requirements for ICT products and services used in public procurement.


ETSI standard

The selected edition depends on the regulatory environment of the buyer. The VPAT allows procurement teams to compare vendors using a consistent framework.

What a VPAT Is Not

A VPAT is often misunderstood. It is not any of the following.

A certification

A legal compliance guarantee

An independent audit, unless explicitly stated

A permanent assurance

Most VPATs are self-declared by vendors. That means the claims are made by the supplier, not independently verified. If a VPAT is inaccurate or outdated, the purchasing organization may inherit risk. It reflects the product at a specific point in time.

Why Organisations Ask for a VPAT

VPATs are commonly requested in:

Public Sector Procurement

Government agencies must demonstrate due diligence when procuring accessible ICT.

Higher Education

Universities frequently require VPATs before adopting learning platforms or digital services.

Enterprise and Regulated Organisations

Large enterprises use VPATs to support governance, supplier risk assessment, and audit trails.

A VPAT helps answer a core procurement question: Is this vendor aware of accessibility obligations, and have they documented their position clearly?

Example Published VPATs

Publicly available examples from well-known software providers. When reviewing examples, note how detailed remarks are provided under each criterion. Strong VPATs are specific, structured, and current.

Provided for illustration only.

Microsoft logo

Microsoft

Accessibility Conformance Reports

Detailed per-product VPATs covering Office 365, Azure, Windows, and other Microsoft services.

Salesforce logo

Salesforce

Accessibility Conformance Reports

Platform-level conformance documentation for Salesforce CRM and related cloud products.

Adobe logo

Adobe

Accessibility Conformance Reports

Product-specific VPATs for Creative Cloud, Acrobat, Experience Cloud, and Document Cloud.

How to Review a VPAT Using AI

Manual review of a VPAT can be time-consuming and inconsistent. AI tools such as ChatGPT can help identify potential red flags quickly.

AI cannot replace an accessibility audit. It can:

  • Highlight vague language
  • Identify contradictory statements
  • Flag outdated standards
  • Surface patterns of exception reporting
  • Summarise risk exposure in plain language

This approach supports structured internal review before escalation to technical teams.

Copy-and-Paste ChatGPT Prompt for Reviewing a VPAT
You are acting as a procurement risk reviewer.

Review the following VPAT text and provide a structured risk analysis.

Tasks:

Identify any instances of vague language such as "partially supported," "supports with exceptions," or generic statements without detailed remarks.

Flag criteria marked as "Supports with Exceptions" and summarise the nature of the exception.

Identify any missing remarks or incomplete sections.

Confirm which WCAG version is referenced and flag if outdated.

Identify any contradictory claims within the document.

Note whether testing methodology or assistive technology testing is described.

Highlight areas that may create procurement or legal risk.

Provide a plain-language executive summary of overall accessibility risk exposure.

Output structure:

• Section 1: Key Red Flags
• Section 2: Documentation Gaps
• Section 3: Standards Currency
• Section 4: Risk Implications
• Section 5: Executive Summary (under 150 words)

Here is the VPAT text:
[PASTE VPAT CONTENT HERE] - or upload readable PDF

How to Use This Prompt

  1. 1.Download or copy the full VPAT text from the vendor.
  2. 2.Open ChatGPT.
  3. 3.Paste the VPAT text into the prompt section.
  4. 4.Insert the review prompt above.
  5. 5.Run the analysis.
  6. 6.Review flagged areas internally.
  7. 7.Escalate to accessibility or legal specialists if needed.

AI review is a screening tool. It does not replace formal accessibility validation.

Common Red Flags in a VPAT

When reviewing a VPAT, pay attention to these indicators.

Frequent "Supports with Exceptions" without detailed explanation

Generic remarks such as "Partially supported" without specifics

Missing dates or version numbers

Reference to outdated WCAG versions

No description of testing methodology

No mention of assistive technology testing

Weak documentation increases procurement uncertainty.

Common questions about VPATs

Practical answers on what VPATs are, how they work, and what to watch for.

What does VPAT stand for?

Voluntary Product Accessibility Template. It is a standardized document format created by the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) for vendors to report how their products conform to accessibility standards.

Who fills out a VPAT?

The vendor or manufacturer of the product. A VPAT is a self-reported document. The vendor assesses their own product against the relevant accessibility standards and records the results. This is why independent auditing of VPATs matters.

Is a VPAT legally required?

For federal procurement, yes. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to evaluate VPATs when purchasing technology. For private sector and state/local government, VPATs are not legally mandated but are increasingly requested as part of procurement due diligence.

What is an ACR?

An Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) is the completed version of a VPAT. The VPAT is the blank template; the ACR is the filled-in document. In practice, people often use 'VPAT' to refer to both the template and the completed report.

How often should a VPAT be updated?

A VPAT should be updated with each major product release or at least annually. An outdated VPAT does not reflect the current state of the product and should not be relied upon for procurement decisions.

Can a VPAT be trusted at face value?

Not without verification. VPATs are self-reported by vendors. There is no certification body that validates them. The quality and accuracy vary widely. Some vendors overstate conformance, omit known issues, or use vague language. Independent auditing of vendor VPATs is a recommended practice.

Final Consideration

A VPAT is a disclosure tool, not a guarantee. It is useful when:

  • It is current
  • It is detailed
  • It reflects real testing
  • It is supported by evidence

Procurement confidence depends not just on receiving a VPAT, but on reviewing it critically.

Five Firms That Provide VPAT Services

Many organisations engage specialist firms to produce or independently audit VPATs.

These firms may provide testing, documentation support, or independent verification.

Level Access logo
Level Access

Provides accessibility audits and VPAT documentation services.


levelaccess.com
Deque Systems logo
Deque Systems

Offers WCAG testing and VPAT preparation support.


deque.com
TPGi logo
TPGi

Delivers accessibility assessments and conformance reporting.


tpgi.com
Microassist logo
Microassist

Provides VPAT assessments and accessibility consulting services.


microassist.com

Disclaimer

All trademarks, service marks, and logos displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, sponsorship by, or contractual relationship with AAAtraq. All rights remain with the respective owners.

References to third-party products, services, organizations, or published documents are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute endorsement or recommendation. AAAtraq has no commercial or contractual relationship with any of the firms, vendors, or organizations named on this page unless explicitly stated.

Example VPATs and conformance reports linked from this page are publicly available documents maintained by their respective publishers. AAAtraq is not responsible for the accuracy, currency, or completeness of third-party content.

The information on this page does not constitute legal advice. Organizations should consult qualified professionals regarding their specific accessibility and procurement obligations.